Monday, 26 August 2013

Karen Admits There is no Evidence Either

Just a quick update to my previous article where Dean Esmay and Suzanne McCarley admit they have embarked on a libelous witch hunt based on zero evidence.

Now Karen Straughan, (AKA: Girl Writes What) has also said that there never was any evidence for the libelous claims that have been levied against Joe Mendez, Murray Pearson, or myself on a mirrored copy by St37One of the video Joe had recently put up on YouTube.

My response to Karen:

So thank you Karen for also coming forth and admitting there is no evidence for the lies that AVFM, mainly Dean Esmay, Paul Elam, and Suzanne McCarley and their cheerleaders have been spreading about us is nothing but a bunch of lies. Thank you for admitting that this is just a witch hunt based on false allegations and accusations.

Now perhaps you could also admit that your bullshit accusations on your blog are also not based on any evidence whatsoever and that you are also guilty of false accusations? How about putting on your big girl panties and owning your shit Karen?

*Edited to add links in second paragraph.

Sunday, 25 August 2013

AVFMs Dean Esmay and Suzanne McCarley Admit They Have No Evidence For Their Libelous Claims

After Dean Esmay and Paul Elam began going on a hysterical rampage accusing myself, Joe Mendez, and Murray Pearson of absconding with a little over 6K in donations for the Earl Silverman Center, Dean and others at AVFM such as Suzanne McCarley, who also jumped on the accusatory bandwagon which was bereft of any evidence, have now come out to say that their libelous claims are based on nothing but their own delusional paranoia.

 "I wouldn't be too surprised to learn that she has broken no laws..."

Really? Thanks for finally saying that Suzanne, after accusing me of being a thief and other nasty shit in previous comments on both articles that falsely accuse me of being a thief. Perhaps you should have shut you gob and thought of that before making libelous statements? See what happens when you react like a child based on raw emotion with no ability to think rationally? You end up looking like a lying fuck.

 "At least that's how we feel..."

Really Dean? You mean your feelz are justification for levying false accusations of theft on me? Isn't it you who has said, numerous times, that feminists base everything on irrational feelings and that it is not proof or evidence of anything?

I think we can safely say you are no better than those feminists you like to bash for their bullshit feelz. I think we can also safely say that your feelings are not evidence of a fucking thing, since you have agreed that is the case in the past about the nasty feminists feelz being used as 'evidence' for something Dean.

"We have no knowledge of Murray's guilt. In fact we have no knowledge of Kristina being guilty of anything..."

So you admit you have no evidence, but that it's ok to falsely accuse Murray and myself and to rally the troops to file false allegations to the authorities regardless?

Oh Dean... The word stupid just does not suffice here. You just could not help yourself could you? Your desire to vilify me in any way possible, because I didn't tow the AVFM line when I was there, is too overpowering for you isn't it? And look where your hate has gotten you? You have become a false accuser and potentially guilty of libel.

Bravo Dean. I am sure your kids will be proud to know their father is a lying fucking idiot because the beauty of the internet is that it doesn't forget, and that it's a great place where your kids will be able to see all this when they search their father's name one day and realize what a lying and vindictive person their father really is.

Friday, 23 August 2013

Kevin Anderson lied for AVFM - Can he admit he lied?

Kevin Anderson (AKA: kevinwaynesongs) is a commenter at AVFM and has jumped on their little bandwagon of lies in order to perpetuate the false claims by AVFM that I am a thief and scammer.

In the comments section of their most recent libelous article about me at AVFM he says:

Yes Dean, it was an old Paypal account that I had used years ago when I was making and selling soap as Hansen Soap Co., and you knew that from the start, so your point is what? That I have somehow made all the money into soap? That this is somehow proof that I stole all the millions in donations?

Oh wait, but you knew about the Paypal account before the donation drive was even finished, and even before you yourself made a donation. Hmmm...

If it were that suspicious then why did you tell me not to worry about using that account and then put your own donation into it? Am I missing something here Dean? Or could it be that you are now just trying to rake me over the coals for your own sick and twisted amusement? I wonder...

Kevin then goes on later in the comments with the following:

Ok, Kevin, let's see if we can possibly get you to tell the truth about this bullshit you are talking on AVFM in a sad attempt to join the witch hunt with the boys.

You made a $25.00 donation to the ESC on May fourth, 2013. Then on July 9th, 2013 you decided to file a claim with your bank to have the funds returned. On July 17th I received the notification from Paypal and agreed to reverse the transaction. The money was instantly returned and the case was closed.

But here you are, a month after the closure of that Paypal claim saying that you have no clue what is going on? Are you seriously that stupid to think that there is no evidence on my end that would prove you are lying?

Well here is the evidence Kevin:

Sorry to burst your little lying bubble, but I did not steal anything did I? I did not abscond with your millions... er... $25.00. In fact I refunded it without issue didn't I?

So ya, I'd appreciate a nice little apology from you Kevin Anderson, admitting you acted like an ass just to perpetuate the bullshit narrative that AVFM has concocted against me. Can you be man enough to admit you lied?

I have put up the proof that you lied, so I'll wait for your kind and swift response to this little matter like any honest and upstanding adult would do when caught out in the open with actual proof, unless you prefer to permanently join the ranks of the village idiots and continue on this witch hunt with your little rusty pitchfork.

AVFM's web of lies

A young man in his late 20's wakes up one morning to find the police on his doorstep. They arrest him and charge him for rape. The man is confused and bewildered as he has no idea what they are talking about.

He finds out that a girl he met 3 weeks ago at a bar has filed rape charges against him, even though he knows he was never in any type of sexual contact with her at all. In fact she had come on to him and he politely refused her advances. He remembers her being quite upset at his refusal to have sex with her, let alone even kiss her, but he brushed it off as a non issue in the end. Now he has found himself locked up in a jail cell being accused of rape by this woman.

Everyone believes her, even some of his own friends, even though she has no evidence to support her claim. People have come to believe her story even without any evidence. Her story is persuasive and seductive to others. It's an easy and believable story that she has concocted, and she has fooled most people into the typical mob mentality of screaming for justice, of presuming he is guilty based only on her story and her ability to prey on their raw emotions. He is regarded now as the scum of the earth, a vile rapist, and is facing the real possibility of being convicted of a crime he never committed because he has no way of proving her claim of rape is indeed a lie, even though he knows it is. What little evidence he may have is brushed aside because the majority of the people are already completely convinced that he is guilty beyond any doubt. And even if he is not convicted of rape he will always be seen as a rapist to many just because she said he is one regardless of the absence of evidence. The mob has decided his fate even before he gets to plead in front of a judge for his innocence.

Of course this is just a story, but sadly, these types of scenarios happen all too often in real life, and innocent people are burnt at the stake based on nothing but someone else's hatred for them. This is how the Salem Witch Trials went.

These sick individuals have no evidence, let alone proof of a crime having been committed, but they are able to whip the community up into a mad frenzy because they know exactly how to manipulate the masses into believing their story: by preying on their raw emotion and the human tendency to love a good drama. Distrust is easy to sow.

These are people who do not regard others as being human, but rather pawns in some sick game to garner them attention, admiration, and sympathy. They don't care about others and how their actions can lead to real life consequences for the person, and people close to that person, that they are raking over the coals. Their ability for empathy and introspection, as well as morality is basically non-existent and they don't care who they hurt in their mission to be seen as the innocent victim.

People who create witch hunts are sociopaths with no regard for anyone else but themselves. They are extremely dangerous individuals and tend to attract like-minded individuals, or weak-minded individuals who are willing to believe anything they say which makes it even more scary and futile for any who gets caught in their trap.

These types of people are happiest when they destroy lives, disregard logic, rationality, empathy, morality and basic human decency for their own ends. Nothing else matters to these narcissistic sociopaths. They will condemn anyone who disagrees with them and viciously attack anyone who questions their story or motivation. This is why many are afraid to speak out around these people: they fear being the next victim.

Imagine how horrific it would be if you were an innocent victim like the man in the story. Imagine how you would feel if you became the target of a campaign of hate based on nothing but hearsay and mob mentality. Imagine knowing that no matter what you say or do that nothing will convince those people that you are innocent, never mind that you are supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. These people do not think like that. They have already convicted you in the court of public opinion, and no matter what, you will likely be seen as a criminal by many of them for the rest of your life, regardless of the truth or evidence. Imagine that no matter what evidence you put forth you will still be called a criminal - the bearer of a scarlet letter for all time.

I want you to seriously imagine how that would feel if it were you. The reality is that none of us are immune to these evil types of people. There is always the real possibility that it could happen to you one day. What would you do if it did? What would your family and friends do if it happened to you? What would the consequences on their lives be as a result of your being falsely accused? How would your every day life be affected by a false accusation of a serious crime where you had no way to convince those that had already deemed you as guilty that it truly did not happen?

And now you may be asking what the point of this article is. Well it's quite simple really.

A Voice for Men (AVFM), which is the self-proclaimed head of the Men's rights movement, has always held the position that they believe in someone's innocence until they are proven guilty, especially men who are accused of serious crimes like rape. They claim to support these male victims of false rape accusations and they often challenge the public not to deem someone guilty based on only a woman's claim that she was raped without any evidence that she was. They like to pride themselves on being rational, critical thinkers who pursue the truth. They claim they are compassionate and unbiased.

Sadly, they are not any of those things. Recently AVFM has embarked on their own false accusation crusade, headed by Dean Esmay and Paul Elam, against myself (Kristina Hansen), Joe Mendez, and Murray Pearson, claiming that we have stolen over $6K from a donation drive we did in the spring of this year for the Earl Silverman Center. (Here and here). The ESC is a project that we three are working on to build a shelter for male victims of domestic violence and have put many dedicated hours into so that this project can one day become a reality.

However, a few weeks ago I announced on Twitter that I was taking a break from the ESC and that things were on hold:

And for those who are not aware, "Agent Orange" is James Huff, the director for AVFM radio. Surprise!

The reason for that break was for very personal reasons on my end which I do not feel obliged to discuss with anyone other than my immediate family and friends. Another reason for the hold on the ESC project was because Murray Pearson, a close personal friend and the co-founder of the ESC, has a court case coming up in the next 2 weeks over, sadly and ironically over a false allegation- which I am not at liberty to discuss since it is not my place to disclose such information.

This one tweet became some sort of 'proof' to members at AVFM such as Dean Esmay, Paul Elam, Suzanne McCarley, Karen Straughan, Dr. Tara Palmatier, and many of their regular followers that I had stolen the donation money. I have no clue how anyone is able to link my one tweet saying I was taking a break from the ESC for a bit to something so serious as fraud and theft. How does one square that circle? How is taking a break for a short period of time equate to criminal activity? I fail to see how any logical person could even conceive of such stupidity, but we are talking about AVFM and so I should not be surprised at their overactive imaginations, especially when it comes to women since many at AVFM despise women and think they are all evil harpies out to get them.

So now there is a concerted effort, headed by Dean Esmay and Paul Elam, to grind me, Joe, and Murray into the mud with false accusations of theft and fraud based on nothing but one tweet. Yes, ONE TWEET. They are now grasping onto anything and everything to confirm their false and potentially libelous narrative to convince others that we are somehow guilty of a crime that never took place. Sound familiar to the story in the beginning of this article?

The truth is that the crime they are accusing us of, if it were to be investigated, would make them look like idiots because no one has stolen anything. And the audacity of these people to 'demand' any evidence from us is ridiculous since they are the ones accusing us of a crime, the onus is on them to support their claims with evidence, not the other way around.

We do not report to AVFM, nor do we have any obligation to provide them anything. if anything, they have now put themselves in the position of having to prove their allegations are true. Or did they not realize that's how this works? Oh, and that requires real proof and evidence, not just a bunch of out of context quotes, screen shots, and deluded personal opinions.

I would be wary of letting them get their nasty little lying hands on anything that they could twist into more lies and false accusations. They have not shown themselves to be trustworthy in the least, and only a fool would divulge any information to them.

The only people guilty of a crime are those over at AVFM who have, and keep on committing the very real crime of libel. And the more they talk, the deeper into the hole they get.

They are of the opinion that we are guilty based on zero evidence or proof of their false allegations towards us, and they will not stop accusing us and attempting to destroy us for their own amusement unless they wake-up and realize this is not a game, and that libel is a serious crime that can be proven here in a court of law.

We three (Joe, Murray, and myself) are the ones who have put all the work and time into trying to get the ESC up and running. This was and always has been our project, and AVFM decided to promote it of their own volition. No one held a gun to their head and demanded they have anything to do with it. We did not force anyone to donate to the ESC, nor did we ever say we could provide receipts for those donations because we had just begun the project and did not, nor do we to date, have NFP status. And nowhere is it guaranteed that we ever will. Earl Silverman was never granted NFP status, and we are under no illusion that the government will agree to our application for the same thing. Neither Murray Pearson, Joe Mendez or myself have ever claimed otherwise.

We are not like those delusional people at AVFM that expect some sort of results in less than 6 months with a whopping $6K. How is anyone supposed to accomplish anything in such little time with such little resources? The work we have put in, on our own time with no pay or compensation, if we were to add it up would amount to much more than the piddly amount we have been donated to work with. Not to mention we all do it on our own time in between all the other important things like work, family, etc... If they want faster results, perhaps they could give us the money to hire staff. No? Then quit bitching. Seriously, what do these people expect to have happened by now? A new building with furnished rooms for clients? And all in less than 6 months on less than 10K? Are you serious? Earl Silverman worked at it for 20 years and had to resort to housing clients in his own home. Something a single man can do, but not something a family with small children could which excludes all three of us from being able to do what Earl did. We need a building, and 6K sure as hell won't do it. Not even close.

And I have to ask, what do they think we did with the money? Have wild weekends in Vegas? Buy a villa in Tuscany? Really? What would a little over 6K get us split 3 ways? You have to be an idiot to think we'd have run a scam for so little. But then again, thieves think that everyone is out to steal their shit right? Just something to think about when considering the source of the accusations.

This witch hunt, orchestrated by those at AVFM is nothing short of a consorted attempt to garner more web hits for profit, and to vilify me because I refused to tow the line while I was at AVFM. They don't like me, and will do anything they can to destroy me, my family, and my reputation. Not to mention the reputations of Joe and Murray, and the ESC as well. They do not care who they hurt or what lies they tell. They are as evil as the women who falsely accuse men of rape - the women they purport to fight against.The hypocrisy of these individuals is amazing.

So be wary when dealing with anyone involved with AVFM. They do not support justice, honesty, integrity, rationality, compassion, or empathy. They only say they do in order to pull the wool over the eyes of their unsuspecting cash cows and weak-minded followers. The only thing that matters to them is how much they can profit from you in the end.

It's easy to say you stand for something, but in the end, your actions speak volumes for themselves.

Thursday, 22 August 2013

John Hembling is lying to suit the narrative... Again.

John Hembling, AKA John the Other, has put out a video that basically says skin cream is made from foreskins, and therefor we should all be up in arms about how horrific it is to use foreskins from innocent babies for a woman's vanity.

SIGH! Another bunch of bullshit to suit the narrative John? Forget the FACT that cream is not made with foreskins!! It "is made from CELLS derived from a single foreskin obtained twenty years ago". ONE FORESKIN THAT IS 20 YEARS OLD!!! It's called stem cells John. Don't believe me? Go look it up yourself. The truth is right there on Google if you care to read any credible information that is scientifically based.

I know... It fucks up your little narrative, but hey, like you love saying - Life is hard... Wear a helmet, right John?

Now, if you had done any research you would see that not only are these cells useful in beauty products, but they are useful for research into the following as well:

Foreskins obtained from circumcision procedures are frequently used by biochemical and micro-anatomical researchers to study the structure and proteins of human skin. In particular, foreskins obtained from newborns have been found to be useful in the manufacturing of more human skin.[54]
Human growth factors derived from newborns' foreskins are used to make a commercial anti-wrinkle skin cream, TNS Recovery Complex.[55](subscription required)
Foreskins of babies are also used for skin graft tissue,[56][57][58] and for β-interferon-based drugs.[59]
Foreskin fibroblasts have been used in biomedical research.[60]

So according to John's argument, we should not only ban skin cream which uses these stem cells, but also any and all other important medical research into possible life-saving drugs or procedures that use any stem cells derived from a foreskin. 

And what about stem cells derived from women's parts like placenta's, breasts, and even vaginal stem cells? Do those matter? Or is it only foreskins we give a shit about? And don't give me that old argument that a circumcision is never necessary crap. If you believe that, then I have to question your ability to understand that some emergency circumcisions truly are medically necessary, just as female vaginal surgery and tissue removal are sometimes necessary due to medical emergencies. People get body parts removed all the time for various medical emergencies, and the cells of those parts can be very useful for medical research. But hey, let's just toss all the foreskins and never use those cells because, God forbid, we upset those overly sensitive men out there. Best to just chuck them and never use them even though that foreskin had to be removed for the patient's own good and well-being anyhow. 

Is any of this sinking in yet?

Now, back to the ridiculous 'cream' debate... If we can even call it that, since there is nothing to debate here when you are actually informed about it, as opposed to ranting away like an ignorant idiot on the subject.

There are creams made from all kinds of other stem cells including, plant, animal, and even an aborted fetus. It's called SCIENCE, dumbass!! 

They are not cutting off foreskins, hacking up fetuses, slaughtering animals, or deforesting swaths of land for skin creams, they are using science to REPRODUCE THE CELLS! 

God! The fucking ignorance and perpetuation of this bullshit by people with personal agendas, like John, is truly pathetic to watch. 

How about just saying unnecessary infant circumcision is cruel, traumatic, and wrong, which is true, and leave it at that without trying to LIE about it by saying they still use foreskins in skin cream? 

Advocate against unnecessary infant circumcision all you want, I agree it is horrible. Just do it with actual FACTS and not some idiotic argument such as "foreskins are in da wiminz skin creamz" to try and make women look bad. But hey, that is really what your end goal isn't it John? It's not about advocating against unnecessary circumcision and fighting for those innocent baby boys, but rather about making all women look evil - because, well, MGTOWs like you don't like women do they John. You are becoming more and more predictable. It's quite sad actually.

All your 'argument' does is make you look more fucking ignorant than you already are, and lowers your credibility below the rockbottom level it reached when you lost that debate to that Manhood 101 child, with those of us who actually think and research things before believing such fucking twaddle.

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

Men are victims and women are evil - Feeding the factless narritive

Ah Facebook. A place you can chat with friends, post LOLCat pics, share a recipe, connect with like-minded groups, and play mundane little games to pass the time. It's also a place where ignorant opinions and uneducated assumptions run rampant and where people fall for all kinds of bullshit advice and stupid opinions that make me want to smack my head on the wall on an all too regular basis.

The latest stupidity has been this article by Fathers and Families from 2011 about Jon Cryer being forced to pay $8,000.00 in monthly child support to his ex. The article claims that he has 96% custody of their child and that it is completely unfair to force him to pay her since he basically has sole custody.

It's a story which has been circulating regularly in MRM circles as of late. It's appeared on my timeline countless times and today I had just about enough seeing this ridiculousness and decided that it was time to educate these people with a dose of reality. Sadly, I feel like I am back in a High School setting where the smart kid ends up doing others homework because they are either too lazy or stupid to do it themselves.

But I digress...

Here is the screenshot of the article in question that keeps popping up on my Facebook feed.

And the 10 additional comments to that article:

Look at the comments on the above post. They are all just knee-jerk reactions to something that none bothered to fact check beforehand. It's so fucking frustrating to see people blindly follow the MRM narrative that all men are victims, and all women are evil.

The article is biased heavily towards the mother, as it keeps mentioning how much of a "deadbeat" she is, and that the only reason the court awarded her the child support was to keep her comfortable and to support her, not her child. However, the link provided by Fathers and Families to the court's appeal PDF shows the real reasoning for the judges decision at the time. It was not to keep her comfortable, but was ruled that:

The trial court also faced the strong possibility that visitation and custody arrangements could change quickly, as they often do in dependency matters. Furthermore, while one parent enjoyed an extraordinarily high income and could easily afford to pay monthly child support of $8,000 or $10,000, the other parent had essentially no income, and would be unable to maintain a household of the sort to which child was accustomed absent substantial support. Given these unusual circumstances, and particularly because the trial court's ruling reflected a paramount concern of protecting child's best interest, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion.
 So in essence this fact, a huge part of why the court ruled in the manner it did, has been completely ignored by the Fathers and Families article where they try to spin it as:

According to both courts, that would be too traumatic for their son.  Keep in mind that 4% of a month is a little over a day.  So according to the court, asking the child to spend a day and a night with his mother in an apartment somewhere in Los Angeles would be so emotionally damaging to him that it warrants imposing child support on a custodial parent.
This is an example of poor and biased reporting. Yes her visitation had been temporarily reduced, but is was not permanent and subject to change at any time without prior notice as it was a dependency matter issued by child welfare authorities.

According to TMZ, the custody arrangement did in fact change:

If you check the dates of the appeal PDF, and the TMZ update, they are exactly one day apart from each other on August 29th and 30th 2011. The article by Fathers and Families was published two days after the TMZ update, on September 1st, 2011. What this tells me is that Fathers and Families either were too lazy to fact check before publishing their article, or they just didn't care because that would blow their biased narrative out of the water. I tend to think the latter was the most likely scenario.

Regardless of these facts, which Fathers and Families chose to ignore, the fact remains that this damned article is still circulating in MRM circles and people are too lazy and thick to take the time to fact check this 2 year old article to see if what was written at the time was indeed factual, and to see if the article is still relevant 2 years later, which it isn't.

In an article by Contact Music, dated July 11, 2013, we discover that the courts have ruled that Cryer is no longer required to pay his ex any child support:

Another article states:

And on and on when you do a Google search for "Jon Cryer court victory" or "Jon Cryer child support".

So there you have it folks. A 2 year old, biased article, which is being passed around as gospel truth by people in the MRM who believe it is still relevant, is not. How surprising! 

Look people. I know it's nice when things fit your narrative and confirm what you want or wish to be true, but life just doesn't give a fuck about what you want or wish to be true. You need to be a bit more skeptical before drinking the Kool-Aid and do a little research on your own to see if what you are swallowing is real. 

I know most people in the MRM want the men to be the victims and the women to be the villains, but the reality is that everyone gets screwed or has victories regardless of their gender. If you are going to blindly follow others, without asking any questions, then I have to question your intentions within the MRM. Are you part of it because you truly want equality and justice for all? Or is it that you just want to vilify women and victimize men to make yourself feel better?

Friday, 9 August 2013

Paul Elam's Love for Drama?

Paul Elam has recently posted an article on AVFM that is nothing short of a witch hunt.

The problem I have with his article is that he 'demands' answers to where the donations for the ESC have gone based on one tweet I put out that said the ESC was currently on hold due to personal reasons on both my and Murray Pearson's (ESCs co-founder) parts. But who the hell is Paul Elam to demand anything from anyone? And let's not forget, Paul Elam is the one who collects well over 100K per year from donors and has never offered any transparency about where that money goes, other than to pay for his and John Hembling's salaries. He claims it's to help boys and men, but I have yet to see AVFM set up anything that actively helps boy's or men in the real world. All Paul has ever done is create drama on his website, and that is hardly what I would call activism. The reality is that AVfM is just a way for Paul to profit off the backs of others, and the proof is in what he has actually said, publicly, on one of his own YouTube rants.

But I digress...

The reality is that I have no intention of running off with the donations raised for the ESC, nor does our co-founder, Murray Pearson. We are committed to this project and want to have the ESC up and running by the fall of 2014. That is our vision - our goal.

Transparency has been 'demanded' by Paul Elam, as well as all kinds of financial information etc... And I agree that donors should be assured that their money is indeed not being used for things other than what it was intended for. But to hand over sensitive information like bank account information to the likes of Paul Elam and his ilk are out of the question. These people have a less than stellar track record for not fucking people over when they get their hands on anything they can use to bully and abuse others for their own amusement.

So knowing that this is true, I will offer this to those of you who want to know why the ESC is on 'hold', and consider this matter closed as of this point forward.

The reason we (Murray and I) have decided to put things on hold in regards to the ESC at the present time is that Murray is currently getting ready to go to trial in September for a false accusation (details of which I am not a liberty to discuss), and all of our efforts are currently focused on getting him through this difficult period of uncertainty. He is currently stressed out to the max and fears the very real possibility of going to jail for a period of time if found guilty. He does not have legal representation, so he is working on getting his opening statement together for the trial, preparing himself for cross examination, and going through mountains of evidence and paperwork. This is the most important issue at the moment, and the reason we have decided to put the ESC on hold until the trial is over. We need to focus on this very important issue right now. Murray needs as much help and support as possible right now.

When the trial is over, and we know where Murray stands, we will know how to proceed with the ESC. Until then, we cannot move forward when we are unsure if our co-founder will still be able to perform his functions or represent the ESC.

Murray is not only the co-founder of the ESC, but also a close personal friend. I will not let him face this alone and I am committed to seeing him though this with all the support and help I can offer him. This means shifting focus for the time being. This means helping him get through one of the most difficult things he has ever faced. It means not letting him go through this alone, which so many men do because no one cares about them. This is what it means to fight for a man's rights when faced with false accusations and potential prison time.

But rest assured, I do not intend to let the ESC die. I will be continuing forward with the plans for the center as soon as the dust clears from the trial, which will hopefully last no longer than a few weeks at most.

The fact that Paul has written his piece without having asked either myself or Murray any questions about why we have decided to put the ESC on hold for a short time, and instead writes a post that is nothing more than biased misinformation designed to hurt myself, Murray, and the ESC is beyond disgusting, even for the likes of Paul Elam.

He is essentially out to kill the ESC and he should be more than ashamed. No one has ever said we are not proceeding with the plans to build the ESC, but now that Paul has written his bullshit piece, we have to now contend with all kinds of false accusations and his lies at a time when Murray needs the most support possible.

We have been fighting to build a center that will not only be difficult to do because of predictable feminist backlash, but also, now, because of Paul's stupidity which has probably done more damage than any feminist group could have. Bravo Paul! For someone who claims to want nothing more than to see the ESC succeed, you sure have a twisted way of showing it by leveling thinly veiled and false accusations and rallying your rabid dogs to attack us.

But we do not give up easily, and refuse to allow people like Paul to destroy something as important as the ESC.

The truth is that Paul and John have an axe to grind with me and will stop at nothing to bully me, and those I associate with, into oblivion. He is not concerned with anyone else but himself and his own inflated ego. No one else matters in Paul's world, and he has said just that publicly for anyone who cares to know the truth.

If he wanted answers, perhaps he should have contacted us first, like any honest and respectable reporter would. But instead he has unleashed his rabid dogs and is sitting back waiting for them to do his dirty work for him because he is incapable of doing what real reporters do, which is gather truthful information before running with a story. But then again, Paul is more like The Enquirer rag of the MRM. Nothing he says should be taken at face value, and what he does say is only good for one thing - drama.

Thursday, 1 August 2013

Deaf dad is mad his ex got their deaf son a cochlear implant?

I don't understand why this father is pissed off at his ex for getting his deaf son a cochlear implant.

The only thing I can think of, that may be pissing him off, is that since he, the father, is deaf, he feels that his son would be fine being deaf too for the rest of his life. But now that his ex has given his son the gift of hearing, he seems pissed that his son is no longer deaf like him.

This is the only conclusion I can come up with as to why this father feels so angry towards his ex for doing something so wonderful for his son. If I were this father I'd be overjoyed that my son could now hear and have the opportunity for a better and easier life than myself. But apparently this guy is too self absorbed and angry at his ex to be able to appreciate the wonderful opportunity she has given their son.